GUN JAM IMMEDIATE VS REMEDIAL ACTION CODE
GUN JAM IMMEDIATE VS REMEDIAL ACTION TRIAL

At that moment he saw appellant Negrillo come out of the guardhouse adjacent to the gate. He said he saw the victim, Mercado, sitting on a monobloc chair facing the gate and holding his cellular phone. He was then cleaning his firearm under a duhat tree, about eight to ten meters away from the guardhouse. 4 She later presented to the court the receipts for the expenses she incurred during her son’s wake and funeral.įernando Azur, OIC of NAPOCOR substation’s security guards, testified that at about 7:45 a.m. She said she spent sixty thousand (₱60,000) pesos for the funeral of her son. At the time of his death he was 25 years old. Further, Sandi testified that it was from foreman Fernando Azur, officer-in-charge of the security guards of NAPOCOR, that he got said gun and ammunition.įrancisca Mercado, mother of the victim, testified that her son earned one hundred eighty (₱180) pesos a day. On cross-examination, witness Sandi corroborated witness Vinluan’s testimony, that Vinluan received the gun with ammunition from Sandi. Later, according to this witness, he and his companions arrested the suspect – who turned out to be Rogelio Negrillo - in his home in San Juan, San Manuel, Pangasinan. With police companions, he proceeded to the National Power Corporation (NAPOCOR) building, where he learned that the suspected killer was no longer there. He thus went to the Sacred Heart Hospital where one Mario Mercado, the shooting victim, was brought for treatment but found him already dead. Next witness, PO3 Avelino Sandi, Jr., testified that on October 7, 2000, he received a report of a shooting incident, which he duly entered in the police blotter. 38-caliber revolver with empty shells, one live and one dud. He said that on October 7, 2000, PO3 Avelino Sandi, Jr. Presented as first witness for the prosecution, SPO3 Vivencio Vinluan testified that he was the evidence custodian of the Philippine National Police (PNP) in San Manuel, Pangasinan.

GUN JAM IMMEDIATE VS REMEDIAL ACTION TRIAL

Upon arraignment, appellant pleaded not guilty to the charge and trial thereafter ensued.

GUN JAM IMMEDIATE VS REMEDIAL ACTION CODE

248, Revised Penal Code as amended by R.A. Mercado, accused’ co-security guard inflicting upon him fatal gunshot wounds in the chest which cause his instantaneous death to the damage and prejudice of his heirs.ĬONTRARY to Art. Domingo, San Manuel, Pangasinan and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the above-named accused, a security guard armed with and using illegally his service firearm, with intent to kill and treachery, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and feloniously shoot Mario G. The undersigned accuses ROGELIO NEGRILLO Y NASTOR alias 'ILYO' of the crime of MURDER committed as follows: On November 9, 2000, appellant Rogelio Negrillo was charged with murder in an Information that read: 149362, as both arise from the same incident, the killing of one Mario G. Per its resolution 2 dated April 1, 2003, this Court ordered that G.R. Gonzalez-Decano, Presiding Judge of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 46, Urdaneta City, and the People of the Philippines.' Catalina Security Agency (Catalina) comes before us, questioning the confiscation of the firearm in favor of the government. 149039, entitled ' Catalina Security Agency, represented herein by its proprietor Placido O. On September 5, 2001, Catalina Security Agency, the licensee of the confiscated firearm, filed a petition for review on certiorari docketed as G.R. In said criminal case, the trial court also ordered the confiscation of the firearm used in the commission of the offense in favor of the government. He was also ordered to pay civil indemnity, moral damages, and costs of the suit to the heirs of the victim, Mario G. Rogelio Negrillo y Nastor 'Ilyo,' by the Regional Trial Court of Urdaneta City, Branch 46, which found appellant Rogelio Negrillo guilty of murder and imposed on him the penalty of death. U-10870, entitled People of the Philippines v. 149362, this Court is tasked to review the decision 1 in Criminal Case No. ROGELIO NEGRILLO y NASTOR ALIAS 'ILYO', appellant. GONZALEZ-DECANO Presiding Judge of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 46, Urdaneta City, and THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, respondents. CATALINA SECURITY AGENCY, represented herein by the Proprietor PLACIDO O.

Gun jam immediate vs remedial action